Now that the weather is gradually growing warmer, my pant hemlines are rising. Yesterday, I pulled on a pair of nice, comfortable stretchy pants and walked out in public. But something felt wrong. With the hemline hitting me just above the ankles, I was an awkward, too-tall teenager again. Halfway through the day, I bent over and rolled the hem up twice. When I stood up, I felt comfortable, fashionable, and, yes, even suave.
I began to wonder what the difference is with pant lengths. I mean, if I feel like a clumsy adolescent in pants just above my ankles (reminiscent of junior high school taunts, "Hey, Noah, when's the flood?") Then why do I feel like I could step into the school lunch room and turn every head with two rolls of the hem? What makes the difference? Is it social conditioning, or are women born with pant-length sensors inside their calves that signal when the him is just right?
And how many names do we need for shorts from the knee to the ankle? Exactly what is a clam digger, in cote hauteur terms? What about capris? Knee shorts? Bermudas?
Excuse me, I need to go put on a skirt.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
-
Hey! It's my birthday! So I got up, wore my sparkly shirt and curly hair and went to church. (Since it was Sunday, I left my customary ... -
by Shirley Bahlmann I didn't know I was a legend until last Tuesday when I sat in front of Snow College Professor Bruce Peterson at my...
-
Since I would be gone two days at a book selling convention, I thought, "Why not work on writing while I sit at the table?" So I...
1 comment:
It all hinges on intent. If the pants are just too short, then you don't have the right size pants. If they are rolled up, then you are intentionally expressing your fashion sense.
Of course, I'm not sure it's wise to take advise from a computer nerd who wears shorts and sandals 300 days a year...
Post a Comment